Now Available:

Featured Resource:

line

Newsletter

Email Address:


line

Ask the Expert

Have a question for our resident expert? Email your questions to Greg.

« Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about ImageX | Main | Retail Vista SP1 to be Released this Week. XP SP3 either This or Next... »

13 Reasons Why IT People Hate Metrics

The short answer here is that they're usually used against us.

Metrics have had a long-standing history in IT circles of bringing artificial objectivity to an otherwise very subjective industry. This is not to say that metrics aren't useful, but rather that they're most often used in non-morale-building ways. In my own personal history, they're most often incorporated to reinforce why management isn't happy with IT rather than why they are happy.

So, what are the 13 reasons? Click past the fold...

From ZDnet:

  1. Metrics are often used to "punish" people -- e.g., to criticize them for bugs, or to fire the people with the lowest productivity.
  2. A common perception is that newly-introduced metrics will be used to punish people -- even if that's not what management had in mind.
  3. Metrics are sometimes used (or misused) as leverage in highly political negotiations about deadlines, budgets, and staffing in high-pressure, risky projects.
  4. "Unintended consequences" -- the introduction of a metrics initiative is likely to have "feedback loop" consequences that nobody expected or intended.
  5. IT organizations sometimes introduce a metrics initiative that measures hundreds of different things, thus overwhelming everyone with a mountain of data.
  6. Other IT organizations introduce a metrics initiative that focuses on only one measurement -- e.g., programmer productivity measured in lines of code per person-month.
  7. Management doesn't realize that, in many cases, you get what you measure -- e.g., if you create the impression that people will be measured by how many lines of code they write, then they'll write lots of code, even if it's buggy, stupid code.
  8. The Hawthorne Effect.
  9. The perception that the metrics data gathered by the newly-introduced metrics initiative will be kept secret, and not shared with the people doing the work.
  10. The perception that the metrics data will be completely ignored by management.
  11. The perception that, even if management does review the metrics results, they won't take appropriate action -- e.g., they'll try to hide or bury the problem, or blame someone else for the embarrassing metrics.
  12. The perception that the metrics results are not credible (sometimes, again, because management doesn't want the world to see just how bad the metrics really are).
  13. The perception that gathering/recording of metrics data will take too much time, and that it's not productive -- e.g., the reaction from software engineers that "we should be doing our work, not spending all of our time measuring the work that we don't have time to do!"

Read the full article at: http://blogs.zdnet.com/projectfailures/?p=641&tag=nl.e539

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.realtime-windowsserver.com/type/mt-tb.cgi/721

Post a comment

(All comments are approved by site leader before appearing here. Thanks for commenting!)

line

Greg Shields' Bio:

Greg Shields, is an independent author, instructor, and IT consultant based in Denver, Colorado, and a co-founder of Concentrated Technology. With nearly 15 years of experience in information technology, Greg has developed extensive experience in systems administration, engineering, and architecture specializing in Microsoft systems management, remote application, and virtualization technologies. Greg is a Contributing Editor for Redmond Magazine, MCPmag.com, and Virtualization Review Magazine and is the author of five books, including Windows Server 2008:  What’s New / What’s Changed. Greg is also a highly sought-after instructor and speaker, speaking regularly at conferences like TechMentor Events, and producing computer-based training curriculum for CBT Nuggets.  Greg is a recipient of Microsoft "Most Valuable Professional" award with a specialization in Windows Terminal Services.