Now Available:

Featured Resource:

line

Newsletter

Email Address:


line

Ask the Expert

Have a question for our resident expert? Email your questions to Greg.

« Changing Server 2008 Core's Look & Feel Part III! | Main | Changing Server 2008 Core's Look & Feel Part IV! »

More Analysis on the Citrix + Xen Merger

Mary Jo Foley gives some in-depth analysis of the Citrix + Xen merger. Interestingly enough, she puts a positive spin on it. My personal opinion is that adding Xen to the already huge Citrix product stable will serve to complicate their partner channels rather than augment them. Citrix partners are already having a difficult enough time selling their existing, wide-ranging product sets.

Here're Mary Jo's thoughs...

Two Microsoft partners, Citrix and XenSource, have tied the knot. Microsoft should be ecstatic…or should it?


Microsoft and Citrix have had a long and winding relationship, since 1997, when Citrix licensed its Multiple Windows technology to Microsoft. Citrix, for its part, got rights to the Windows Server source code and a joint-product deployment agreement — plus an estimated $185 million. In the ensuing years, there was talk that Microsoft would end up competitng with and killing off Citrix, interspersed with talk of secret payments made by Microsoft to keep Citrix afloat (which Citrix has denied, by the way).

Microsoft and XenSource are newer partners. The two signed a pact in July 2006 to cooperate on technology that would provide interoperability between Linux systems running the Xen hypervisor and Microsoft’s forthcoming Windows Server Virtualization hypervisor (codenamed “Viridian”).

But the marriage of its two buddies isn’t sitting well with Microsoft, according to Citrix and terminal-services expert Brian Madden.

“(E)verything that I’ve heard is that Microsoft is not happy about this. Again, now Citrix is going head-to-head with Microsoft in this market,” Madden blogged.

A week ago, Madden blogged about the likelihood of Citrix buying XenSource. He noted that it would make a lot of sense for Citrix to own a hypervisor, given the growing likelihood that delivering users’ desktops virtually will become the order of the day in the not-too-distant future.

Read the rest of this very interesting post (and Brian Madden's commentary) at:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=646&tag=nl.e539

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.realtime-windowsserver.com/type/mt-tb.cgi/336

Post a comment

(All comments are approved by site leader before appearing here. Thanks for commenting!)

line

Greg Shields' Bio:

Greg Shields, is an independent author, instructor, and IT consultant based in Denver, Colorado, and a co-founder of Concentrated Technology. With nearly 15 years of experience in information technology, Greg has developed extensive experience in systems administration, engineering, and architecture specializing in Microsoft systems management, remote application, and virtualization technologies. Greg is a Contributing Editor for Redmond Magazine, MCPmag.com, and Virtualization Review Magazine and is the author of five books, including Windows Server 2008:  What’s New / What’s Changed. Greg is also a highly sought-after instructor and speaker, speaking regularly at conferences like TechMentor Events, and producing computer-based training curriculum for CBT Nuggets.  Greg is a recipient of Microsoft "Most Valuable Professional" award with a specialization in Windows Terminal Services.